pradenk

Just drove by a 711 and thought, shit... wish I had a slight Indian accent. Haven't had their chili cheese nachos since '98. Damn. I feel old. Seriously folks. That's not hyperbole.

If you know how gov't works, CIA, FBI, DOJ, Congress, MSM; they report & comment on small events in various areas to prepare ppl, get them used to hearing something significant but subtle to desensiti... View MoreIf you know how gov't works, CIA, FBI, DOJ, Congress, MSM; they report & comment on small events in various areas to prepare ppl, get them used to hearing something significant but subtle to desensitize the public when a larger more purposeful event occurs to push change, legislation, restrict or remove rights, raise taxes, etc. Dems & Biden are horrifically tanking, ATF making laws instead of enforcing laws, foreign affairs, inflation... False Flag incoming? I see one coming. Always be vigilant, just in case.

View Less

Pistol Brace rule-- DEAD, by Supreme Court, back in 1939. United States v Miller. Miller case reads: The Court cannot take judicial notice that a shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long has ... View MorePistol Brace rule-- DEAD, by Supreme Court, back in 1939. United States v Miller. Miller case reads: The Court cannot take judicial notice that a shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long has today any reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, and therefore cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees to the citizen the right to keep and bear such a weapon. In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense. In addition, Justice McReynolds wrote: With obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of such forces the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made. It must be interpreted and applied with that end in view. Conclusion: If the scotus did a little bit of research they would have found that sbs's were used as military weapons/trench guns. But that's not the point. The point is, the MK18 is an AR15 style 10.3in barrel sbr rifle, with a stock. It also has a 30rd magazine. It's also outfitted with a 3 round burst and full auto. Finally, the MK18 is also furnished with a SUPPRESSOR... So, by the Miller case, a short barrel rifle (10.3in barrel) MK18 with 3 round burst, full auto, 30rd magazine and suppressor-- is constitutionally protected as "Ordinary Military Equipment", "That's its use could contribute to the Common Defense" and the "Second Amendment Guarantees the Right to Keep and Bear Such an Instrument". Game Over. No need to comply. Scotus ruled this already. NFA is done. Read U.S. v Miller.

View Less