IMG_4810

REMEMBER THIS RESEARCH SHOWS… Based on available information, there is evidence from 2019 that former FBI lawyer Lisa Page testified that the Obama-era Department of Justice (DOJ) advised the FBI not to pursue charges of “gross negligence” against Hillary Clinton in relation to her use of a private email server during her time as Secretary of State. This testimony was brought to light by Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe during closed-door sessions, and it was widely reported by news outlets such as Fox News, The Washington Post, and the Washington Examiner at the time. Here are the key points: • During her testimony in 2018, Lisa Page, under questioning from Rep. John Ratcliffe, stated that the FBI had multiple discussions with the Obama DOJ about the possibility of charging Clinton with “gross negligence” under the Espionage Act. However, the DOJ ultimately decided against it, arguing that the term “gross negligence” was constitutionally vague and had rarely, if ever, been used in similar cases. • Page specifically confirmed that the DOJ made it clear to the FBI that they should not pursue this charge. For example, she interrupted Ratcliffe during questioning to agree that “That is correct” when he suggested the DOJ had effectively told the FBI they would not bring such a case. • This testimony was part of a broader context of political bias allegations, as Page and her former colleague Peter Strzok, with whom she exchanged anti-Trump text messages, were already under scrutiny. Republicans, including President Donald Trump at the time, seized on this testimony to claim that the Obama DOJ was corrupt and interfered in the Clinton email investigation. • However, other reports and testimonies, including from then-FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, maintained that the decision not to charge Clinton was based on a lack of evidence of criminal intent and the legal standard for prosecution. The DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General also concluded in 2018 that while there were concerns about how the investigation was handled, there was no evidence of political bias or improper influence directly from Obama himself. • It’s important to note that while Page’s testimony suggests a “stand-down” order from the Obama DOJ, there is no direct evidence that President Barack Obama personally ordered this. The decision appears to have been made by DOJ prosecutors and officials, such as then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, based on legal and constitutional considerations. • The controversy was fueled by the perception that the Obama administration was protecting Clinton, especially after Lynch’s controversial meeting with former President Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac in 2016, which raised questions about impartiality. However, Lynch maintained that the meeting was social and did not influence her decisions. In summary, Lisa Page did admit during her 2018 testimony that the Obama DOJ advised the FBI against charging Hillary Clinton with gross negligence in the email scandal, effectively ordering a “stand-down” on that specific charge. However, this was not a personal directive from Obama but rather a decision by DOJ prosecutors based on legal interpretations. The full context shows a complex interplay of legal, political, and investigative factors, and while the testimony was significant, it did not conclusively prove corruption or bias at the highest levels of the Obama administration. This information is based on reports from 2019 and should be considered in light of ongoing debates and investigations at the time. No new developments on this specific issue have emerged as of the latest updates in 2025.