FB_IMG_1738080877504

I REPOST TO REMIND VOTERS WHAT HAPPENED... REMEBER THIS POST 1/28/2020? This is a long drawn out explanation of what is at stake...IN THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL OF DONALD JOHN TRUMP AS THE "PEOPLES" ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE USA....representing the wishes of the people. Congress has always wanted a president sub-servant to the JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES. THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THIS IDEA. THE PEOPLE ELECT THE PRESIDENT TO REPRESENT THE USA BASED ON HIS WORDS AND PROMISES AND VOTERS DESIRES. THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IS FILLED WITH MEMBERS THAT ARE GIVEN THEIR STATUS BY GOVERNMENTAL NOMINATION AND CONGRESSIONAL MAJORITY VOTE. THE CONGRESS IS ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE TO DO AS THEY PROMISE AND OFTEN LIE TO GET ELECTED. THEN THESE "PUBLIC SERVANTS" DO AS THE POLITICAL PARTIES AND SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS WANT...OFTEN ENRICHING THEMSELVES AGAINST VOTERS WISHES. OUR PRESIDENT IS DIFFERENT...IN TIMES OF CONGRESSIONAL STAGNATION...BY VIRTUE OF EXECUTIVE ACTIONS OF PRIVILEGE AND ORDERS CAN OVER RULE NON-ACTION OF CONGRESS TO GET VOTERS WISHES AND MOVE OUR NATION FORWARD. THESE ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF DIFFERENCES IN THE WAYS OUR GOVERNMENT FUNCTION. THE PROBLEM TODAY IS CONGRESS IS SEPARATED BY PARTISAN POLITICAL MANUEVERING. ONE PARTY DEMANDS A COMPLETELY SEPARATE ACTION FROM THE 2ND POLITICAL PARTY. CONGRESS HAS ALWAYS COMPROMISED AND COMPLETED LEGISLATION. FOR 220 YEARS IT HAD BEEN THIS WAY. THE LAST 20 YEARS HAS BEEN DIFFERENT...SOCIALIST IDEAOLOGY HAS CREATED UNCOMPROMISING STANCES IN THE CONGRESS. BOTH PARTIES ARE TO BLAME. THIS IS WHERE THE PEOPLES WISHES BY BEING REPRESENTED BY A PRESIDENT FULFILLING HIS PROMISES BECOME A PARAMOUNT NEED. TO MOVE OUR COUNTRY FORWARD. BY THE PEOPLES ELECTED OFFICIAL. PARTISAN UNCONSTITUTIONAL BEHAVIOR THAT CONTRADICTS THE CONSTITUTION BY TRYING TO REMOVE THE PEOPLES REPRESENTATIVE BREAK THE STANCE THAT "WE THE PEOPLE" RULE THE USA. THIS IS WHAT IS AT STAKE TODAY....DO THE PEOPLE ACTUALLY RULE THIS LAND...IS THE CONSTITUTION ACTUALLY THE LAW OF THE LAND. CAN ANY PARTY IMPEACH THE PEOPLES CHOICE OF PRESIDENT BECAUSE THEY JUST DO NOT LIKE HIS POLITICS? IT IS IMPORTANT. Eisenhower denied any executive branch employee to be subpeonaed for the last 3 years of his second term...THE PRESIDENT IS EQUAL AND SEPARATE FROM OTHER BRANCHES HE CAN DENY ANY CONGRESSIONAL ORDERS OR JUDICIAL RULINGS...EXCEPT SUPREME COURT RULINGS. THE SUPREME COURT BY NOT RULING DOES NOTHING BUT KEEP THE STATUS QUO. THEREFORE THE PRESIDENT REMAINS ABLE TO DENY CONGRESS AND JUDICIAL BRANCH WITH EXECUTIVE ORDER AND EXCEUTIVE PRIVLEGE. THE SUPREME COURT MUST RULE IN ORDER TO SET PRECEDENT FOR FUTURE ADMINISTRATIONS. IF NOT THEN THE PRECEDENT HAS ALREADY BEEN SET BY EISENHOWER IN THE 50'S. OVER 45 TIMES HE DENIED CONGRESSIONAL SUBPEONA AND JUDICIAL RULING. SIMPLE.