THERE IS A PROCESS WHEN A FEDERAL NATIONAL ELECTION IS CHALLENGED DUE TO FRAUDULENT CHALLENGES THROUGH OUT THE NATION.
NOW SINCE THE 2020 ELECTION THERE HAS BEEN FOUND FRAUDULENT FINDINGS THROUGH O... View MoreTHERE IS A PROCESS WHEN A FEDERAL NATIONAL ELECTION IS CHALLENGED DUE TO FRAUDULENT CHALLENGES THROUGH OUT THE NATION.
NOW SINCE THE 2020 ELECTION THERE HAS BEEN FOUND FRAUDULENT FINDINGS THROUGH OUT THE BIDEN CWMPAIGN LED BY A FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE USA. AND DEMOCRATIC STATES.
WHEN DONALD TRUMP ASKED PENCE TO CHALLENGE THE 2020 ELECTION RESULTS...TRUMP WANTED THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS TO BE USED. BECAUSE MULTIPLE STATES HAD CLAIMS OF FRAUD...MULTIPLE STATES USED "COUNT EVERY VOTE" AND FEDERAL LAW ONLY ALLOWS FOR VOTES BY U.S. CITIZENS. MSIL IN BALLOTS OUTNUMBERED THE AMOUNT OF VOTERS USING MAIL IN VOTES.
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS IS AS FOLLOWS...
Constitutional and legal procedures for addressing voter fraud claims
Claims of voter fraud in the United States trigger a multi-layered process involving both state and federal authorities, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The specific steps involved can vary depending on the nature and timing of the alleged fraud, but generally involve these elements:
1. Initial challenges and investigations (state level)
Voter Challenges: Many states allow registered voters to challenge the eligibility of other voters, either on the registration rolls before an election or at the polls on Election Day.
Election Day Challenges: These challenges, often raised by poll watchers, may involve questioning a voter's eligibility based on residency, citizenship, age, or other factors.
Provisional Ballots: In many states, a challenged voter who insists on their eligibility can cast a provisional ballot, which is reviewed after Election Day to determine whether it should be counted.
Post-Election Hearings: Some states require post-election hearings to determine the validity of challenged votes or voter eligibility issues.
State Investigation: If allegations of fraud arise, state election officials (often the Secretary of State or a state election board) are typically responsible for conducting investigations to determine the validity of the claims and whether any laws were violated.
2. Federal involvement
FBI Investigation: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has a role in protecting the integrity of federal elections and can investigate election crimes, particularly if they involve federal candidates, election officials abusing their office, false voter registration, targeting protected classes, or campaign finance violations.
Department of Justice (DOJ): The DOJ is responsible for enforcing federal laws, including those prohibiting voter fraud and interference with voting rights. This can include prosecuting individuals who engage in illegal voting, voter suppression, or other forms of election fraud.
Federal Laws: Several federal laws address voter fraud, such as 18 U.S.C. § 241 (conspiracy to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate voters) and provisions of the Voting Rights Act and National Voter Registration Act (prohibiting false information in registration, multiple voting, etc.).
3. Recounts and audits
Recounts: States have laws outlining the conditions under which a recount can be requested or automatically triggered, usually in cases of a narrow margin of victory.
Post-Election Audits: Many states conduct post-election audits to verify the accuracy of the vote count and the overall integrity of the election process, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Risk-Limiting Audits: These audits involve examining an increasing number of ballots if discrepancies are detected, potentially leading to a full hand count if necessary to support the reported results, says Verified Voting.
4. Legal challenges
Election Contests: Legal challenges to election outcomes (contests) are primarily resolved through state laws and litigation in state and/or federal courts, according to the Library of Congress (.gov).
Electoral Count Reform Act: This federal law, passed in 2022, sets a higher bar for challenging a state's slate of electors in Congress, requiring a vote from 20 percent of each chamber (House and Senate) to consider a challenge.
In essence, while the US Constitution entrusts states with the primary responsibility for administering elections, federal law and agencies play a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity of the process and addressing serious allegations of fraud or interference. It is important to note that credible allegations of widespread voter fraud are rare and most incidents are found to be isolated or due to administrative errors, says the Brennan Center for Justice.
PENCE CHOSE NOT TO DECLARE A CHALLENGE BUT HE DID HAVE THAT POWER. THE CONSTITUTIONSL PROCESS WOULD HAVE ELIMINATED ALL DOUBT...
uscourts gov scotus gov usconstitution gov whitehouse gov senate gov houseofrepresentatives gov congress gov
I HAVE LOOKED AT DOW HISTORICAL DATA AND FOUND REASONS THAT DAYS OF THE WEEK HAVE A REAL TRADING INFLUENCE ON YOUR MONEY.
Research into stock market returns has identified a phenomenon known as the "... View MoreI HAVE LOOKED AT DOW HISTORICAL DATA AND FOUND REASONS THAT DAYS OF THE WEEK HAVE A REAL TRADING INFLUENCE ON YOUR MONEY.
Research into stock market returns has identified a phenomenon known as the "day of the week effect" or "weekend effect," suggesting certain days may historically exhibit better or worse performance than others.
Days with historically better gains
Tuesdays: Studies analyzing S&P 500 performance from 2000 to 2024 indicate Tuesdays have historically produced the highest average daily returns. Some analyses even show Tuesdays alone having a better stock market performance than all five trading days combined. This trend appears robust, even during bear markets.
Days with historically weaker gains
Mondays and Fridays: These days have historically shown the lowest average daily returns for the S&P 500. This could be due to several factors, including bad news released over the weekend leading to negative sentiment on Monday or a general decrease in market activity as investors prepare for the weekend on Friday.
Wednesdays: Some analyses show Wednesdays as having weaker performance compared to Tuesdays and Thursdays. However, other sources suggest they can be days of higher returns.
Important considerations
Statistical Significance: While these patterns have been observed, their statistical significance and practical implications for investors are debated.
Efficiency and Arbitrage: Market efficiency suggests that if such patterns are consistent and predictable, traders will likely exploit them, potentially causing the effects to diminish over time as they are arbitraged away.
Long-Term Investing: For long-term investors, the day of the week is likely less impactful than a well-diversified portfolio and a consistent investment strategy like dollar-cost averaging.
In essence, while some historical data suggests potential variations in daily stock market performance, relying solely on the day of the week for investment decisions is generally not recommended due to the complexity of market behavior and the potential for these effects to be diminished by market forces.
I HAVE NOTICED THAT A SOCIALIST NEWS MEDIA WILL ALWAYS TRY TO SPIN LABOR, TARIFF, INFLATION, EMPLOYMENT, AND OTHER STATISTICS TO CAUSE DOW CHAOS DURING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. IT USUALLY TAKES 24-48 HOURS FOR TRUTH TO COME FORWARD AND THAT CHAOS TO CLEAR.
In the United States, several government agencies are responsible for collecting, analyzing, and reporting key economic indicators like GDP, inflation, and employment data.
Here are the primary agencies and their responsibilities:
Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA): This agency focuses on providing a comprehensive picture of the U.S. economy.
The BEA is responsible for calculating and reporting the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which measures the market value of all final goods and services produced in the country.
They also prepare National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA), which provide information on the value and composition of national output.
Additionally, BEA reports on international trade (including the balance of payments), international investment, and regional economic data like per capita personal income and gross state product.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS): This agency is the principal fact-finding agency for labor economics and statistics.
The BLS is the primary source of information on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which measures inflation, and the Producer Price Index (PPI).
They also collect and report data on employment and unemployment, including the unemployment rate and payroll employment figures.
The BLS also measures labor market activity, working conditions, and productivity.
U.S. Census Bureau: While known for population data, the Census Bureau also provides a variety of economic indicators.
They collect and report data related to business and economy, including information on construction, housing, international trade, retail trade, wholesale trade, services, and manufacturing.
The Census Bureau's economic indicator surveys offer measures of economic activity that inform business investment and policy decisions.
They also produce the Quarterly Financial Report (QFR), which includes data on corporate profits.
Department of Commerce: This department oversees the BEA and the Census Bureau, serving as a significant source of key economic indicators, including GDP, population data, and trade and investment statistics.
These agencies work collaboratively and independently to provide a comprehensive view of the U.S. economy, supporting informed decision-making by government, businesses, and the public.
MOST OF THESE AGENCIES LEAN LEFT...REMEMBER THIS IN INVESTING.
dow com nasdaq com
OBAMA IS NOT IMMUNE TO PROSECUTION AS A FORMER PRESIDENT AND USA CITIZEN. IF HE COMMITTED A CRIME OF TRYING TO PREVENT A FREE NATIONAL FEDERAL PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION BY LYING. CHEATING, AND COMMITING ... View MoreOBAMA IS NOT IMMUNE TO PROSECUTION AS A FORMER PRESIDENT AND USA CITIZEN. IF HE COMMITTED A CRIME OF TRYING TO PREVENT A FREE NATIONAL FEDERAL PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION BY LYING. CHEATING, AND COMMITING CRIME OR ORDERING THE SAME OF HIS ADMINISTRATION OR FOLLOWERS. SIMPLE FACT.
READ THE CONSTITUTION...IT IS THE LAW...NOT THE SCOTUS DECISION IF THAT DECISION IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTITUTION. SCOTUS OPINIONS DO NOT COUNT!
THE SCOTUS IS ANALYZING WHETHER A PRESIDENT HAS COMPLETE IMMUNITY FOR ACTIONS AS PRESIDENT. IT DOESN'T MEAN TREASONOUS ACTIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
The U.S. Constitution defines treason in Article III, Section 3, and it applies to all citizens, including the president. Specifically, the Constitution outlines two ways a person can commit treason: by levying war against the United States or by adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. The Constitution also specifies that a conviction for treason requires the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court.
The Constitution also addresses the process for removing a president, including for treason, through impeachment. Article II, Section 4, states that the President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States can be removed from office upon impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. The House of Representatives has the sole power to impeach, while the Senate has the sole power to try all impeachments.
IT IS TRUE A SITTING PRESIDENT MUST FIRST BE IMPEACHED AND REMOVED FROM OFFICE TO BE PROSECUTED FOR TREASON. A FORMER PRESIDENT IS A CITIZEN OF THE USA AND DOES NOT HAVE THAT PRIVILEDGE.
A former president can be prosecuted for treason, while a sitting president cannot be indicted or prosecuted. The Department of Justice has taken the position that a sitting president has temporary immunity and cannot be indicted or prosecuted while in office. However, a former president is subject to the same laws as any other citizen and can be prosecuted for crimes committed while in office or after leaving office.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Sitting President:
Immunity:
While the Constitution doesn't explicitly grant immunity, the Department of Justice has long held the position that indicting or prosecuting a sitting president would interfere with their ability to govern.
Impeachment:
The Constitution provides for impeachment by the House of Representatives and trial by the Senate as a means of removing a sitting president from office for misconduct.
No Indictment/Prosecution:
The DOJ policy, established in the Nixon era, is that a sitting president cannot be indicted or prosecuted.
Former President:
No Immunity:
Once a president leaves office, they are subject to the same laws as any other citizen.
Prosecution:
A former president can be indicted and prosecuted for crimes committed while in office or after leaving office.
Example:
President Gerald Ford granted a pardon to President Richard Nixon for any crimes he may have committed while in office, acknowledging that a former president can be prosecuted.
Treason:
The Constitution defines treason as "levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort". A former president could be prosecuted for treason if they engaged in such acts.
uscourts gov ussenate gov ushouseofrepresentatives gov us constitution gov aclu com
THERE IS A BUNCH OF CRAP GOING ON BETWEEN POWELL AND TRUMP...HERE IS TRUTH.
Jerome Powell's term as the Federal Reserve Chairman ends in May 2026. His term as a member of the Board of Governors exten... View MoreTHERE IS A BUNCH OF CRAP GOING ON BETWEEN POWELL AND TRUMP...HERE IS TRUTH.
Jerome Powell's term as the Federal Reserve Chairman ends in May 2026. His term as a member of the Board of Governors extends to January 31, 2028. Powell was sworn in for his second term as chair on May 23, 2022.
SO ON MAY, 2026 TRUMP CAN NOMINATE A REPLACEMENT FOR POWELL.
Yes, a President can nominate a new Federal Reserve Chair, and this nomination goes through a Senate confirmation process.
Here's how the process generally works:
The President of the United States nominates a candidate to serve as the Chair of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
The nominee must be confirmed by the United States Senate.
The Fed Chair serves a four-year term, which is renewable upon re-nomination by the President and re-confirmation by the Senate.
The Fed Chair is selected from among the members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, who are appointed to longer, staggered terms (14 years).
Therefore, even if a Fed Chair has different political views than the President, the President can still nominate a replacement when the Chair's term expires...
Replacing a Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair, like Jerome Powell, involves a formal process overseen by the U.S. President and requires Senate confirmation.
1. Nomination by the president
The President nominates a candidate for the position of Fed Chair from among the Board of Governors, according to Wikipedia.
It's important to note that the Chair can be selected from outside the Board, but the individual must first be nominated and confirmed as a Board member before becoming Chair.
2. Senate confirmation
The nomination is then sent to the Senate for its consideration.
The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs is typically responsible for vetting and holding hearings on the nominee.
After the committee stage, the nomination may be brought to the full Senate for a vote.
Confirmation of the Fed Chair requires a simple majority vote in the Senate.
3. Presidential appointment
If confirmed by the Senate, the President signs a commission for the nominee, and they are sworn into office, according to the Center for Presidential Transition.
Recent developments regarding Powell
Jerome Powell is currently serving his second term as Fed Chair, which ends in May 2026. His term as a member of the Board of Governors extends until January 31, 2028.
There have been public discussions and speculation about a potential replacement for Powell, particularly from political figures.
In July 2025, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that a formal process to identify a successor for Powell had begun within the administration.
Bessent noted that the decision and timeline for announcing a new Fed Chair would be determined by the President.
Powell has remained silent on whether he would step down from the Board of Governors if his term as Chair concludes.
While the President has the power to remove a Board member for cause (e.g., malfeasance), removing the Chair for policy differences is not straightforward and could face legal challenges.
Important Note: The independence of the Federal Reserve is a crucial principle, aimed at allowing the central bank to make decisions based on economic data and stability rather than short-term political pressures.
congress gov
READ THE CONSTITUTION...IT IS THE LAW...NOT THE SCOTUS DECISION IF THAT DECISION IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTITUTION. SCOTUS OPINIONS DO NOT COUNT!
THE SCOTUS IS ANALYZING WHETHER A PRESIDENT HAS C... View MoreREAD THE CONSTITUTION...IT IS THE LAW...NOT THE SCOTUS DECISION IF THAT DECISION IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTITUTION. SCOTUS OPINIONS DO NOT COUNT!
THE SCOTUS IS ANALYZING WHETHER A PRESIDENT HAS COMPLETE IMMUNITY FOR ACTIONS AS PRESIDENT. IT DOESN'T MEAN TREASONOUS ACTIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
The U.S. Constitution defines treason in Article III, Section 3, and it applies to all citizens, including the president. Specifically, the Constitution outlines two ways a person can commit treason: by levying war against the United States or by adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. The Constitution also specifies that a conviction for treason requires the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court.
The Constitution also addresses the process for removing a president, including for treason, through impeachment. Article II, Section 4, states that the President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States can be removed from office upon impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. The House of Representatives has the sole power to impeach, while the Senate has the sole power to try all impeachments.
IT IS TRUE A SITTING PRESIDENT MUST FIRST BE IMPEACHED AND REMOVED FROM OFFICE TO BE PROSECUTED FOR TREASON. A FORMER PRESIDENT IS A CITIZEN OF THE USA AND DOES NOT HAVE THAT PRIVILEDGE.
A former president can be prosecuted for treason, while a sitting president cannot be indicted or prosecuted. The Department of Justice has taken the position that a sitting president has temporary immunity and cannot be indicted or prosecuted while in office. However, a former president is subject to the same laws as any other citizen and can be prosecuted for crimes committed while in office or after leaving office.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Sitting President:
Immunity:
While the Constitution doesn't explicitly grant immunity, the Department of Justice has long held the position that indicting or prosecuting a sitting president would interfere with their ability to govern.
Impeachment:
The Constitution provides for impeachment by the House of Representatives and trial by the Senate as a means of removing a sitting president from office for misconduct.
No Indictment/Prosecution:
The DOJ policy, established in the Nixon era, is that a sitting president cannot be indicted or prosecuted.
Former President:
No Immunity:
Once a president leaves office, they are subject to the same laws as any other citizen.
Prosecution:
A former president can be indicted and prosecuted for crimes committed while in office or after leaving office.
Example:
President Gerald Ford granted a pardon to President Richard Nixon for any crimes he may have committed while in office, acknowledging that a former president can be prosecuted.
Treason:
The Constitution defines treason as "levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort". A former president could be prosecuted for treason if they engaged in such acts.
uscourts gov ussenate gov ushouseofrepresentatives gov us constitution gov aclu com
page=1&profile_user_id=25176&year=&month=
Load More
