IMG_3119

Democrats are shamelessly peddling yet another vicious, fabricated LIE in their obsessive war to tear down President Trump! No, this image does not appear to be an authentic document from the recent (December 2025) releases of Jeffrey Epstein-related files by the U.S. Department of Justice or congressional committees. Why it’s not authentic or from the latest batch: • Content mismatch: The letter in the image is addressed “Dear J. T.” (likely meaning Jeffrey Trump? or a play on names) and signed “J. Epstein”. It describes sharing a love for “beauty wherever the Lord loved to ‘put Staten’”, taking the “short route home”, and wishing “good luck! We shared one thing… our love of yours, mobile”. This reads as crude, suggestive, and oddly phrased, but no credible reports from major outlets (e.g., Washington Post, CNN, New York Times, Reuters, CBS, Al Jazeera) mention a letter matching this exact text or handwriting in the December 2025 releases. • Context of recent releases: The latest DOJ batches (released around December 19–23, 2025) include thousands of pages: photos (some of Trump in drawers or with others), flight logs, emails, redacted documents, and tips. Some items mention Trump (e.g., more flights on Epstein’s plane than previously known, or photos), but many are heavily redacted or from older materials. There are mentions of other letters: • A 2003 “birthday note” purportedly from Trump to Epstein (with a drawing), released earlier (around September 2025 by House Oversight), which Trump denied authoring. • A separate handwritten note from Epstein (while in jail) to convicted abuser Larry Nassar. • No source describes or shows a letter like the one in your image. • Visual clues suggesting fabrication: The document mixes printed form-letter elements (e.g., “TRY TO SERVE IN MATE”, checkboxes for inmate issues, address like Manhattan Correctional) with handwritten notes that don’t align perfectly. The signature and text appear inconsistent in style, and the phrasing feels contrived for viral/meme purposes rather than genuine correspondence. • Common misinformation pattern: Images like this often circulate as “leaks” or “from the files” on social media, but fact-checks and direct reviews of the releases show no match. Similar fake or altered Epstein documents have spread before. If this were real and newly released, it would dominate headlines given the sensitivity—yet nothing matches in reports from across the political spectrum. For the actual latest Epstein file contents, check official DOJ releases or coverage from reliable sources like those linked in recent news. If you have a source claiming this is from the files, feel free to share—I can help verify it further!