IMG_2216

FRUSTRATING because I had so much respect for Candace Owens before the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Now not so much because Candace Owens a ‘conservative’ immediately started to throw out for public viewing wild conspiracies that have tormented Erika and their kids, that’s not a distraction—that’s a betrayal of the family values we claim to defend. Fixing that fracture in our own house IS one of the important things.” This whole saga between Candace Owens and Erika Kirk is a heartbreaking mess, turning a genuine tragedy—the assassination of Charlie Kirk in September 2025—into a public spectacle of grief, accusations, and what feels like performative outrage. For context, Erika, Charlie’s widow and now CEO of Turning Point USA, went on Fox News and CBS this week in raw, emotional interviews, pleading with conspiracy theorists (clearly aimed at Owens) to back off. She described the toll it’s taking: death threats to her team, reliving the trauma daily, and even fears of grave desecration if people keep hunting for Charlie’s undisclosed burial site. Her message boiled down to a simple, gut-wrenching five words: “Stop. That’s it. That’s all I have to say. Stop.” Owens’ response? In a video she posted shortly after, she twisted it into something about her—“It’s about me! It’s indirect, but it’s also about me”—before doubling down on her “investigation” into Charlie’s death, questioning TPUSA’s finances, and even implying Erika isn’t fit to lead because she’s “playing mommy” instead of a CEO. This comes after Owens repeatedly said on her show that only Erika (or her husband George Farmer) could get her to stop pushing these theories—like shadowy “Egyptian planes,” inside jobs, or U.S. military involvement. Erika finally did exactly that, publicly and directly. And Owens… just kept going, framing it as a personal slight or evidence of a cover-up. Look, I get the appeal of conspiracy theories—they’re a way to make sense of senseless evil, especially when the official story (a lone gunman, Tyler Robinson, arrested on the spot) feels too tidy for such a high-profile hit. Owens has built her brand on fearless truth-telling, and she’s tapped into real frustrations with institutions like the FBI or TPUSA’s donor machine. But this? It’s crossed into cruelty. Erika’s not some shadowy operative; she’s a grieving mom shielding her kids from a “mind virus” of lies that’s led to kidnapping threats and staffers quitting in fear. Owens’ refusal to honor her own “off-switch” promise smells like narcissism—turning Charlie’s legacy into clickbait for her 1.5-million-view episodes, while TPUSA raises $140 million in donations that Owens now slanders as a grift. (And let’s be real: the IRS just cleared TPUSA of any fraud probes, per a Treasury letter.) At its core, this isn’t about justice for Charlie anymore—it’s a power play. Owens could’ve pivoted gracefully, said “Erika spoke, so I’m out,” and focused her fire on actual systemic rot (like endless foreign aid or media bias). Instead, she’s alienating allies, fracturing the right, and profiting off a widow’s pain. Erika’s “righteous anger,” as Fox’s Harris Faulkner called it, is justified—she’s honoring her husband’s memory by building that “spectacular” memorial while begging for one sacred thing: peace. Owens should listen. Not because it’s polite, but because dragging this out dishonors everyone involved, including the truth-seeking fans who deserve better than endless drama. If Owens truly cared about Charlie, she’d stop. Full stop. The real conspiracy here is how quickly “question everything” devolves into “torment the survivors.” Let’s hope this feud implodes before it does more damage.